<![CDATA[OGE STEM - Blog]]>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 03:30:39 -0700Weebly<![CDATA[So What is STEM Anyway?]]>Tue, 29 Aug 2017 14:15:36 GMThttps://www.ogestem.com/blog/so-what-is-stem-anywayWith the Great Eclipse behind us, it's now time to turn our attention to moving forward as a school with a true STEM culture.  But exactly what does that mean?

All of us, no matter what our age, remember our own days in school.  The classrooms, the art on the wall, the worksheets, the homework, the tests. In most settings the very structure of education relied on common setup: a teacher with a cache of information, and students whose sole goal is to access and retain that information.  The teacher teaches, the student correctly restates, and learning is achieved.   Periodically a new innovation like open classrooms, portfolio assessments, or backward design comes along to point to new possibilities, new strategies, to turn the field on its head.  But more often than not, often under the immense pressure of standardized testing, new ideas are set aside and the old pattern of teacher-to-student-information-flow resumes.  There’s a feeling that nothing really changes.

Now everyone is talking about STEM.  But again, what does that mean?  We all know the letters: Science, Technology, Engineering, Math.  Oddly enough though, merely recognizing the acronym could actually cause us to miss the point of what STEM is supposed to be.  Busy teachers with good intentions (and enthusiastic STEM coaches) often inject a little math or maybe a building activity to a science lesson and hope that it at least looks like STEM is being achieved.  Often they are forced to “do STEM” on designated days. Of course, integrating even small bits of STEM into the process is great, and not to be discouraged, but a true STEM culture may start with throwing away the acronym all together.

In a recent webinar, Cindy Moss, Senior Director of Global STEM Initiatives for Discovery Education, suggested four new words: Students and Teachers Energizing Minds.  A little hokey, I agree, but this alludes to the core of what STEM is: encouraging different ways of thinking within the process, and importantly, re-imagining of the roles of student and teacher in the classroom. So let’s break this down.

How does the learning process in a STEM classroom deviate from the traditional?  The difference lies in who has the information and in which direction it flows.  Which brings me way back to myself as a new teacher.  Beasley Middle School.  Palatka, Florida.

When I first started as a middle school science teacher, with really no training in either science OR teaching, I was constantly terrified that I was going to be outed as the know-nothing fraud that, frankly, I really was.  I knew nothing of earth science, say, beyond what I read in Smithsonian Magazine or saw on old reruns of Star Trek. (Look it up – they were always doing some sort of analysis of other planets with their tricorders.) So I would stay one step ahead – reading ahead to the next chapter and anticipating every possible question that the smartest 6th grader could come up with. And, I realized, I could actually fool them.  With a few jokes, a fun lab here and there, and a tough test, everything was fine.  I had complete control of the knowledge and the kids had to prove to me that they got it.

My next job - a tech teacher in a magnet school - forced me into an entirely new approach.  Technology (particularly in the world of consumer electronics) was - and is of course - constantly changing; there was no way I could be the master of all that evolving content.  As soon as I got a new Mac, or a new digital camera (remember those?) for my lab, one of my students would have the next better thing.  So I had no choice but to give in and embrace my ignorance. 

Instead of compiling lists of content I needed my students to learn, I identified what I wanted my kids to be able to do – design a web page to promote a social justice cause, produce a commercial to sell a product, redesign an outdoor space at the school to accommodate kids in wheelchairs – and simply challenged them to figure it out how to do it, with whatever help I could provide.  So we leaned together.  We stumbled.  We made mistakes. To paraphrase Vanderbilt University professor Peg Cagle, “We fell on our faces magnificently.”  But I quickly realized that not always knowing the answer wasn’t a deficiency.  When I could finally answer a question with, “I don’t know.  Let’s figure it out,” I was free to get out of the way let the learning really begin. My lab was a truly creative space where kids hunkered down to multi-faceted and multi-week projects, self-directed and with giddy purposefulness. (We called it constructivism back then, a term I’d be happy to see come back.) 

This is the contrast I see between a traditional class and a STEM class.  The questions STUDENTS ask, and the answers that STUDENTS finally come to, must be the driving force in the room. The “correct” answer – TEACHER answers, OUR answers – simply don’t matter.

So to be sure, the roles of students and teachers have to be different in a STEM classroom.  Students are active. They wonder, they ask questions, they define problems.  They answer thought-provoking questions.  They confront complex, real-world problems with their own original solutions.  They research, develop, and test theories  They fail, and they try again.  Indeed they learn to succeed at failure – to see a setback as an opportunity to learn more.

Teachers, on the other hand, must learn to encourage kids to wonder, to ask questions, to define problems.  Teachers must ask the thought-provoking questions.  They must present the complex, real-world problems.  They must give their students the time and the guidance to ask questions and find answers, to research, to test theories, to fail, and to try again.  They need to teach kids to succeed at failure – to see a setback as an opportunity to learn and grow and innovate.

And maybe most importantly, they - WE - should not be afraid to get out of the way and let the learning really begin.]]><![CDATA[The Great Eclipse]]>Thu, 17 Aug 2017 14:29:37 GMThttps://www.ogestem.com/blog/the-great-eclipseThanks to Patty Wilder for sharing an interesting article from the September 22, 1922 issue of the East Oregonian Round-Up about an eclipse from that year.  Fascinating to see how attitudes have changed. (The article refers to the "unpleasantness of a dark day.")  The 1922 ads are pretty great too. Jamie Owen sent out this great video about the history of eclipses' effect on the evolution of scientific thought.  Well worth the six minutes.  And finally, Noel Mainland sent me a funny song about the definition of STEM.  I put that one on the homepage.  Keep 'em coming!

Like most schools, OGE has gone eclipse CRAZY.  Our kids are trying on glasses, reading books, watching videos, calculating distances, and learning all about the great mass of incandescent gas in the sky.. (Actually it's more of a "miasma of incandescent plasma.")  Here's how things are looking for Monday, May 21 (prepared by STEM Coordinator Kendall Xides and sent as an E-blast to parents):

OGEclipse!
All students that will be participating in outdoor eclipse activities including viewing the eclipse need to return a Dekalb County permission slip.  Permission slips were sent home Tuesday. Students who do not have permission will gather in the cafeteria to watch the live feed from Fernbank Science Center.

Students viewing the eclipse with their class will be using verified eclipse glasses from American Paper Optics.

Teachers will be instructing children on how to use the eclipse glasses for safe viewing, but parents are encouraged to review safety procedures for viewing the eclipse with their child.  Many videos are available, including this one from The American Astronomical Society.  Looking at the sun without eclipse viewers can cause serious damage. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTCkC5ANlJg)

Students will not be outside for the entirety of the eclipse.  The partial eclipse begins at 1:06pm. Some classes will participate in observations and activities at different times during the partial eclipse.  All students with permission slips will begin going outside with their class at 2:15pm to observe the maximum eclipse at 2:36pm, and then return to their classrooms. 3rd-5th graders will be working on the National Park Service's Eclipse Explorer Junior Ranger.

Check-out:
Parents wishing to check their child out for the eclipse need to do so by 12:30pm.  This will be an unusual day because of delayed dismissal, and parking will be limited as buses will be on campus.  If you wish to experience the eclipse with your child, please plan to check-out your student before 12:30pm.

Viewing Location:
Kindergarten - courtyard
1st Grade - fire lane
2nd, 3rd, 5th - field by playground
4th grade - side lot by cafeteria

ADDITIONAL RESOURCES:

This is the live feed on the day of the eclipse from NASA
https://www.nasa.gov/eclipselive

This is the live feed from Fernbank Science Center's telescope:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=fxbS6YazrE4

The eclipse glasses will be hand delivered today.  Please review Mrs. Maughborne's email on safety.  Any pair of glasses that is scratched or damaged should not be used.

All classes will receive a classroom set of an observation activity that can be used during the eclipse.  There is a writing extension at the bottom of the activity.

3rd-5th grade classes will also receive a classroom set of the National Park's Junior Ranger Eclipse Explorer book that has a variety of eclipse activities.

​Have a great Eclipse Day no matter where you are and don't forget your eye protection!


]]><![CDATA[STEMapalooza!]]>Thu, 29 Jun 2017 15:45:46 GMThttps://www.ogestem.com/blog/stemapalooza
As part of Oak Grove's effort to intensify its STEM certification effort, I attended STEMapalooza! on June 20-22.
Attendees participated in STEM/STEAM enriched learning opportunities that cultivated critical thinking and problem-solving skills necessary for future success in STEM related college and career fields. We deepened our understanding of effective STEM practices and integrated science, technology, engineering, and mathematics instruction (including integration of content-area standards).  The goal was to create authentic, deeper learning STEM/STEAM opportunities for our students. Sessions varied from workshops, panel discussions, presentations, keynotes and informal collaboration opportunities. 
The conference, with over 200 sessions and 400 attendees, was hosted by STEM Cobb, http://www.stemcobb.com/ The excitement was contagious - it was inspiring to see so many fellow teachers truly excited by their work with Atlanta's kids.  Project-based Learning and STEM-focused lessons are changing the way teachers teach and kids learn!
]]>